home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
082889
/
08288900.057
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-09-17
|
3KB
|
60 lines
HEALTH, Page 66Abortions Without DoctorsWith Roe v. Wade under fire, feminists propose a radical step
The Supreme Court decision to throw the abortion issue back to
the states has thrown pro-choice supporters into turmoil. If, as
many fear, abortion becomes tightly restricted or banned, what are
women to do about unwanted pregnancies? Some feminists are
proposing a radical remedy: women should master abortion techniques
and perform the procedure for one another.
That idea is being widely discussed by women's groups and has
already drawn sharp criticism not only from right-tolifers but from
medical authorities and some pro-choice supporters. Promoters of
self-help abortions are looking at several methods, including RU
486, the controversial French pill not yet available in the U.S.
But most of the attention is focusing on menstrual extraction, a
technique that can be used to end a pregnancy through the eighth
week. At a recent meeting in Dallas, sponsored by the local unit
of the National Organization for Women, more than 100 women saw a
30-minute videotape that showed how the procedure is performed with
a $90 kit containing a glass jar, plastic tubing and a special
syringe. "We're being realistic,'' says Charlotte Taft, an
abortion-clinic director who spoke at the meeting. "When abortion
becomes illegal, not many physicians will risk losing their
licenses. If I have a choice between going to a group of caring
women I trust or a stranger, then I'll take the women."
Advocates think the lessons will keep women from seeking
back-alley butchers or resorting to the horrifying home measures,
such as inserting coat hangers and douching with Lysol or
Coca-Cola, that were common before Roe v. Wade made abortion legal
nationwide in 1973. NOW's national headquarters in Washington takes
no position on self-help abortions but has not discouraged its
local affiliates.
First championed by women's groups in the early 1970s, when
abortion was illegal in most states, menstrual extraction is a
variation of the vacuum aspirations used in medical clinics. A thin
plastic tube is first inserted through the cervix into the uterus.
Then the uterine lining, along with an embedded fertilized egg, is
suctioned out by pumping a syringe attached to the tubing.
Proponents of the procedure insist that it is safe.
But medical experts are skeptical. Warns Dr. E. Hakim Elahi,
medical director of Planned Parenthood: "It's a wrong notion that
abortion is very easy." He and others fear that cursory instruction
will lead to medical complications. "There's no way that watching
a video and seeing someone demonstrate this is going to make
self-help procedures safe," declares gynecologist Michael Burnhill
of the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, N.J.
Possible dangers: missing the tiny fertilized egg, lacerating the
cervix, perforating the uterus, and spreading bacterial infection.
Many feminists call the effort politically misguided. They
argue that it gives the wrong impression that abortion is already
illegal and unobtainable. They are also concerned that it diverts
attention from their battle to keep abortion legal. Whether that
battle is won or lost, the pursuit of self-help abortions makes one
thing clear, warns Patricia Ireland of NOW: "The demand for
abortion will continue and will be met one way or another."